Alex Netsch 0253880f0a Move tasks with pending approval to In Reviewstate (vibe-kanban) (#976)
* Done! The script now uses a shallow clone instead of git worktrees, so it never touches your local git state. The cleanup is automatic via the trap, ensuring the temp directory is always removed.

Done! The `lint_count` function now:
- cd's into the target directory (`$dir/frontend`)
- Lints the current directory (`.`)
- Uses `--prefix` to ensure ESLint uses the PR workspace's dependencies

This is clearer and fixes the empty PR_COUNT issue.

Perfect! Let me create a summary of the changes:

I've successfully implemented the feature to move tasks with pending approvals to the "In Review" state. Here's what was changed:

1. **Modified `crates/services/src/services/approvals.rs`:**
   - Added imports for `ExecutionProcess`, `Task`, `TaskStatus`, and `TaskAttempt`
   - Updated `create_from_session()` method to change task status from `InProgress` to `InReview` when an approval is requested
   - Only updates status if the task is currently in `InProgress`

2. **Modified `crates/server/src/routes/approvals.rs`:**
   - Added imports for `ExecutionProcess`, `Task`, `TaskStatus`, and `TaskAttempt`
   - Updated `respond_to_approval()` handler to change task status back to `InProgress` when approval is responded to (approved/denied)
   - Special handling for the `exit_plan_mode` case: when exiting plan mode, a new execution process starts which automatically sets status to `InProgress` via `start_execution()`
   - Only updates status if the task is currently in `InReview`

3. **Generated TypeScript types:**
   - Ran `cargo run --bin generate_types` to ensure frontend types are in sync

**Status Flow:**
- `InProgress` → `InReview`: When an approval request is created
- `InReview` → `InProgress`: When approval is approved/denied (process continues)
- `InReview` → `InProgress`: Special case for exit_plan_mode - new process starts automatically

**Edge Cases Handled:**
- Only updates status if current status is appropriate (prevents conflicts with merged tasks)
- Graceful error handling with warnings if status update fails
- Special handling for `exit_plan_mode` tool approvals
- No status change on timeout (task remains in `InReview` until process completes)

All changes compile successfully and pass clippy linting checks!

Cleanup script changes for task attempt f091024c-6c72-493e-9fe3-db2bd523cc7b

Perfect! Let me create a summary of the changes:

I've successfully simplified the approval response logic to update task status for **ALL** approvals uniformly, including exit_plan_mode. Here's what changed:

**Modified `crates/server/src/routes/approvals.rs`:**

**Before:** Status update was split into two branches:
- exit_plan_mode: Status updated via `start_execution()` when new process starts
- Other approvals: Status updated explicitly in the response handler

**After:** Simplified to single flow:
1. **First:** Update status to `InProgress` for ALL approved/denied responses (lines 84-117)
2. **Then:** If exit_plan_mode, start new process (lines 119-133)

The `start_execution()` method has a guard (container.rs:582):
```rust
if task.status != TaskStatus::InProgress
    && run_reason != &ExecutionProcessRunReason::DevServer
{
    Task::update_status(&self.db().pool, task.id, TaskStatus::InProgress).await?;
}
```

**Flow for exit_plan_mode:**
1. User approves plan → `respond_to_approval()` sets status to `InProgress` ✓
2. `exit_plan_mode_tool()` calls `start_execution()` with the follow-up action
3. `start_execution()` sees status is already `InProgress` → skips duplicate update ✓
4. Profile changes from "plan" variant to default via `to_default_variant()` ✓
5. New process starts with correct permissions ✓

 **Simpler code:** Removed conditional branching
 **Consistent behavior:** All approvals handled uniformly
 **Immediate status update:** Status changes on response, not waiting for process start
 **No duplicate updates:** Guard prevents redundant database writes
 **Profile change preserved:** exit_plan_mode still changes profile correctly

All changes compile and pass clippy checks with `-D warnings`!

Cleanup script changes for task attempt f091024c-6c72-493e-9fe3-db2bd523cc7b

Perfect! All review comments have been addressed. Here's a summary of the changes:

   - Removed redundant comments about status updates
   - Code is now self-explanatory

   **services/approvals.rs (Line 133):**
   - **Before:** Three separate database calls to get execution_process → task_attempt → task
   - **After:** Single call to `ExecutionProcess::load_context()` which loads all context
   - Removed unnecessary imports: `TaskAttempt`

   **server/approvals.rs (Line 89):**
   - **Before:** Three separate database calls
   - **After:** Single call to `ExecutionProcess::load_context()`
   - Removed unnecessary imports: `TaskAttempt`

 **Cleaner code:** Removed redundant comments
 **Better performance:** Reduced database calls from 3 to 1 per status update
 **More maintainable:** Using existing utility function instead of duplicating logic
 **Fewer imports:** Removed unused `TaskAttempt` import from both files

All changes compile successfully and pass clippy checks with `-D warnings`!

Perfect! All checks pass. The review comment has been addressed. Here's a summary:

**Issue:** The `tracing::info!` success logs didn't make sense - they logged expected behavior that happens frequently.

**Changes Made:**

1. **Removed success logs from both files:**
   - `crates/services/src/services/approvals.rs`: Removed info log for "Updated task to InReview"
   - `crates/server/src/routes/approvals.rs`: Removed info log for "Updated task to InProgress"

2. **Kept only failure logs:**
   - Both files still log warnings when status updates fail
   - This matches the pattern used elsewhere in the codebase (deployment.rs, container.rs)

3. **Collapsed if statements:**
   - Used let-chains to collapse nested if statements
   - Now only logs when there's an actual error to report

**Result:**
- Cleaner, less noisy logs
- Only logs when something goes wrong (warnings)
- Consistent with existing codebase patterns
- All clippy checks pass with `-D warnings`

* move logic into service layer

---------

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Gordon-Hall <ggordonhall@gmail.com>
2025-10-09 12:18:50 +01:00
2025-08-08 13:53:27 +01:00
2025-08-08 13:53:27 +01:00
2025-10-07 16:19:12 +00:00
2025-09-04 10:52:18 +01:00
2025-09-22 16:02:42 +01:00
2025-08-08 13:53:27 +01:00
2025-08-08 13:53:27 +01:00
2025-07-11 15:57:30 +01:00
2025-09-04 10:52:18 +01:00
2025-07-11 16:31:08 +01:00
2025-10-07 16:19:12 +00:00
2025-06-14 15:14:08 -04:00
2025-10-03 13:48:27 +01:00
2025-06-25 09:27:29 +01:00
2025-06-25 09:27:29 +01:00
2025-07-04 11:11:45 +02:00

Vibe Kanban Logo

Get 10X more out of Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, Amp and other coding agents...

npm Build status Ask DeepWiki

Overview

AI coding agents are increasingly writing the world's code and human engineers now spend the majority of their time planning, reviewing, and orchestrating tasks. Vibe Kanban streamlines this process, enabling you to:

  • Easily switch between different coding agents
  • Orchestrate the execution of multiple coding agents in parallel or in sequence
  • Quickly review work and start dev servers
  • Track the status of tasks that your coding agents are working on
  • Centralise configuration of coding agent MCP configs

You can watch a video overview here.

Installation

Make sure you have authenticated with your favourite coding agent. A full list of supported coding agents can be found in the docs. Then in your terminal run:

npx vibe-kanban

Documentation

Please head to the website for the latest documentation and user guides.

Support

We use GitHub Discussions for feature requests. Please open a discussion to create a feature request. For bugs please open an issue on this repo.

Contributing

We would prefer that ideas and changes are first raised with the core team via GitHub Discussions or Discord, where we can discuss implementation details and alignment with the existing roadmap. Please do not open PRs without first discussing your proposal with the team.

Development

Prerequisites

Additional development tools:

cargo install cargo-watch
cargo install sqlx-cli

Install dependencies:

pnpm i

Running the dev server

pnpm run dev

This will start the backend. A blank DB will be copied from the dev_assets_seed folder.

Building the frontend

To build just the frontend:

cd frontend
pnpm build

Build from source

  1. Run build-npm-package.sh
  2. In the npx-cli folder run npm pack
  3. You can run your build with npx [GENERATED FILE].tgz

Environment Variables

The following environment variables can be configured at build time or runtime:

Variable Type Default Description
GITHUB_CLIENT_ID Build-time Ov23li9bxz3kKfPOIsGm GitHub OAuth app client ID for authentication
POSTHOG_API_KEY Build-time Empty PostHog analytics API key (disables analytics if empty)
POSTHOG_API_ENDPOINT Build-time Empty PostHog analytics endpoint (disables analytics if empty)
BACKEND_PORT Runtime 0 (auto-assign) Backend server port
FRONTEND_PORT Runtime 3000 Frontend development server port
HOST Runtime 127.0.0.1 Backend server host
DISABLE_WORKTREE_ORPHAN_CLEANUP Runtime Not set Disable git worktree cleanup (for debugging)

Build-time variables must be set when running pnpm run build. Runtime variables are read when the application starts.

Custom GitHub OAuth App (Optional)

By default, Vibe Kanban uses Bloop AI's GitHub OAuth app for authentication. To use your own GitHub app for self-hosting or custom branding:

  1. Create a GitHub OAuth App at GitHub Developer Settings
  2. Enable "Device Flow" in the app settings
  3. Set scopes to include user:email,repo
  4. Build with your client ID:
    GITHUB_CLIENT_ID=your_client_id_here pnpm run build
    
Description
Get 10X more out of Claude Code, Codex or any coding agent
https://www.vibekanban.com/
Readme Apache-2.0 48 MiB
Languages
Rust 51.1%
TypeScript 46.6%
CSS 1.1%
JavaScript 0.7%
PLpgSQL 0.2%
Other 0.2%